Commissioning and Final Acceptance of Projects

Introduction

This paper highlights the ways to manage battle between contractors and customers. But during the commissioning procedure for the construction, a review report with a construction inspector and inspector demonstrated that there were slight flaws in the HVAC system. So, since the broker representing my customer, I’m tasked with dealing with the customer and the contractor in order to think of an amicable solution with respect to the issue in hand.

Commissioning Procedure

The builder was supposed to deliver the construction as completely operational. The identical business was paid a lump sum which could appeal for all costs. This will involve the hiring of a different electric company to deal with all setups. The HVAC system was a part of the electric system. On the other hand, the major contractor needed to be compensated an additional amount to fix the HVAC system however the customer refused to do this saying that those weren’t the provisions of the agreement as stipulated by their own contract. “The key advantage of mediation is hazard and cost management. Since the parties arrive at the answer, the disputants keep control of the whole procedure.”
The customer was advised of the HVAC flaws and also the job of the chief contractor. The customer declined to bring any more money towards the project. The customer claimed that the appropriate clause with respect to the battle mentioned was clearly stipulated in the contract. The customer further promised that the builder had approved all of the details of the contract with no question. This was the case as most of the other bidders of this contractor. The customer, therefore, believed that the builder was going contrary to the conditions of the arrangement. It had been presumed that the bidding would look after any contingency compared to additional costs that the builder would need to incur.
The contractor has been advised of this position that the customer had taken with respect to the flaws in the HVAC system. The builder confessed that they had neglected to raise this issue during the bidding meetings. This is because these consequences hadn’t been detected. But they maintained that the flaw wasn’t due to them and that they’d completed their civil work flawlessly. They maintained that the extra costs shouldn’t be imposed on these but on the electric company that had set up on the HVAC system.
On further scrutiny of this contract arrangement, it had been discovered that the builder had a poor case to establish. This is due to the fact that the customer made an arrangement with the civil firm rather than the electric company. Hence any dispute was to be dealt with between the electric company and the civil company. Considering that the commissioning was recovered, the customer wasn’t to endure the consequences of the battle. An amicable solution was invented as well as the HVAC system was mended and the battle difficulties be sorted out afterward. This meant the last payment of the builder wasn’t altered and the issuance of the last certificate was completed in time.
The final stage of jobs entails a “formal endorsement of the job and the end thereof.” Assessing the lessons learnt and document archiving are a number of the administrative actions involved.
The final phase entails:
Deal near: settle and finish each contract. Each contract that’s applicable to the specified project ought to be closed.
Job close: all of the actions in each of the procedure groups ought to be finalized for the formality of shutting the specified project.
An example related to this instance is provided by means of a case analysis by Whitticks (2005) titled ‘Immediate and Consequential Costs’. In the last stage, the subsequent announcement resolves the dispute between the builder and the customer “Such punishment for delay will be recoverable from Contractor by any means available to Business under the conditions of the Contractor in law.”

Conclusion

Before accepting provisions of any contact, comprehensive scrutiny ought to be performed and any ambiguous announcement is brought forward for clarification. This may look after any potential situation that might happen throughout the project execution. “Honesty and candor between the operator and the builder is essential for innovative construction administration.”