Philosophy Of Leadership Paper

Week 8 Assignment Philosophy of Leadership

Length: Paper: 8 – 10 double-spaced pages (excluding title and references pages) Due: Week 8 by Wednesday Midnight Value: 250 Points for 25% of the grade Post: Week 8 Assignments — Turnitin

Personal Philosophy of Leadership Paper Guidelines Prepare and submit through turnitin an 8 – 10 page paper that includes your definition of leadership, discusses three leadership theories that have influenced you, analyzes your leadership style, examines followership, and reflects on insights gained. A well-constructed paper will reference 6 or more scholarly sources including 5 journal articles such as those assigned and retrieved from Brandman’s virtual library, and adhere to APA standards. Leadership Definition Provide your definition of leadership and what has influenced this definition.

Your definition must be original but supported by the work of others. Support your analysis with two (2) or more scholarly sources including one (1) journal article. Leadership Theories Discuss three (3) major leadership theories that have most influenced your thinking on leadership and leaders. In your leadership challenge paper, you discussed classical leadership theories. In this paper, consider including the contemporary approaches of Authentic, Servant, Adaptive and/or Transformational Leadership. Select at least two theories or models that you haven’t already written about in week 5 for your final paper. Define and describe the components of the selected theories using four (4) or more scholarly sources including three (3) journal articles. Leadership Style Analyze your strengths and style(s) as a leader.

Use three (3) or more assessments from the Northouse text to assess your effectiveness in the leadership approaches as described in the above section; and compare your qualities and characteristics to those of effective leaders. Support your analysis with two (2) or more scholarly sources including one (1) journal article. Followership Discuss what effective followership is and why it is an important component of leadership. How can you enhance your effectiveness as a follower and encourage it in others? Support your analysis with one (1) or more scholarly sources. Reflective Analysis In two – three pages, reflect on three (3) key leadership lessons you have learned from this course. What has influenced you the most and has been of the most value to you)? How has your thinking and/or behavior changed to enhance your leadership practice? Describe two (2) specific action you will take to enhance your leadership effectiveness. Evaluation Criteria Criteria Exemplary Proficient Developing Emerging Leadership Definition 25 – 23 Provides clear, concise and original 22 – 20 Provides clear and fairly original 19 – 18 Provides a definition of leadership that 17 – 0 Limited if any clear definition of definition of leadership. Describes influences to this definition forming the link to coursework. Uses 2 or more scholarly sources including 1 journal article. definition of leadership. Describes influences to this definition but may not link it coursework. Uses 2 sources but 1 may not be scholarly. may not be original. Describes 1 or more influences but may not link it to coursework. May use 1 source that may not be scholarly. leadership. Does not describe influences linked to coursework or use sources to support discussion.

Leadership Theories 50 – 45 In-depth and accurate discussion of 3 major theories influencing philosophy. Fully describes major components of the theories; references scholarly sources by the author(s) or originators of 3 theories 44 – 39 Accurately discusses 3 major theories influencing philosophy. Describes most components of each theory; references scholarly sources by the author(s) or originators of 2 theories 38 – 33 Describes 2 – 3 major theories influencing philosophy. . Describes some components of the theories. Acknowledges the author(s) of theories but relies heavily on secondary sources such as Northouse 32 – 0 Describes in general terms 0 – 2 major theories influencing philosophy. May rely solely on secondary sources such as Northouse; may not acknowledge author(s) of theory.

Leadership Style 50 – 45 Fully analyzes personal style of leadership drawing from 3 or more selfassessments of influential leadership theories. Compares style to leadership theories; and the qualities and characteristics of effective leaders. Uses 2 scholarly sources including 1 journal articles 44 – 39 Analyzes personal style of leadership drawing from 2 – 3 self-assessments of influential leadership theories. Compares style to leadership theories and the qualities and characteristics of effective leaders. Uses 2 sources although 1 may not be scholarly. 38 – 33 Somewhat analyzes personal style of leadership drawing from 1 – 2 selfassessments; assessments may differ from influential theories. Somewhat compares style to leadership theories, and characteristics of effective leaders. Uses 1 – 2 sources which may not be scholarly. 32 – 0 Limited if any discussion of personal style of leadership. May draw from 0 – 2 selfassessments. Limited if any comparison of style to leadership theories and/or characteristics of effective leaders. May not use sources to support discussion

Followership 25 – 23 Comprehensively discusses effective followership and why it is important to the study of leadership. Draws from 1 or more scholarly sources 22 – 20 Clearly discusses effective followership and why it is important to the study of leadership. Draws from 1 scholarly source 19 – 18 Somewhat discusses effective followership but may not include its importance to leadership. Draws from 1 source that may not be scholarly. 17 – 0 Limited if any discussion of effective followership or its importance to the study of leadership. May not use sources to support discussion. Reflective Analysis 50 – 45 Clearly and concisely discusses 3 key leadership lessons learned in course. Describes influences and what has been of most value. Clearly identifies 2 specific actions intended. 44 – 39 Clearly discusses 2 – 3 leadership lessons learned in course. Describes influences and what has been of most value. Identifies 2 fairly specific action intended. 38 – 33 Discusses 1 – 2 leadership lessons learned in course but may not describe influences and/or what has been of most value. Identifies 1 – 2 general action intended. 32 – 0 Limited if any reflective analysis. Discusses 0 – 2 leadership lessons learned but does not describe influences and/or what has been of most value. May not identifies any action intended. APA and Sources 20 – 19 Uses 6 or more scholarly sources including 5 journal 18 – 17 Uses 5 scholarly sources including 4 journal articles. . 16 – 15 Uses 4 – 5 sources including 3 – 4 journal articles. May 14 – 0 Uses 0 – 4 sources. Limited adherence to APA standards in the articles. Accurately uses headers and adheres to APA standards; reference page and citations are correct. All sources listed in References are cited in paper Uses headers and adheres to APA standards; reference page and citations are correct with minor (1-3) errors. . All sources listed in References are cited in paper use headers and somewhat adheres to APA standards; the work of others is cited but with numerous (4 – 10) errors. Sources listed in References and citations may not match paper and Reference page; work of others may be cited but with multiple (11+) errors. Sources listed in References and citations do not match

Writing Mechanics 30 – 27 The paper is logical and well-written; spelling, grammar and punctuation are accurate. Paper is the required length of 8 – 10 pages of content, and includes correctly prepared title page. 26 – 23 The paper is logical and well-written but with minor (1 – 3) errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation. The content may be 5% too long or short; includes a correctly prepared title page. 22 – 19 The paper is somewhat logical and well-written but with several (4 – 10) errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation. The content may be 10% too long or short, and may not include a correctly prepared title page 18- 0 The paper lacks clarity and may be confusing; may contain numerous (11+) errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation. The content may be 15% too long or short, and may not include a title page