Analysis of An Argument
For your first essay, select an argument for analysis. Follow the pattern suggested below to present your written response. This essay should range from 3 – 4 pages in length, so keep it concise. On the other hand, be sure to offer adequate introduction of the argument, and to develop your analysis thoroughly, quoting from the article in support of your discussion. .
In order to guide your effort, there is a rubric on the reverse side of this sheet; furthermore, you are asked to divide the essay into two parts:
Part one consists of 2 to 3 paragraphs introducing the work by author and title, as well as noting the rhetorical context of the piece, its intended audience and other orienting information that you infer from clues accompanying the work’s publication. In addition, in part one you should note the author’s claim and your sense of his or her reasons offered in support of that claim; you should furthermore comment on what sort of evidence the author provides in support of those reasons, and you should comment briefly on how the argument is arranged and presented; does the author employ appeals to logic, to emotion, to ethics? Does he or she use humor, satire, or other strategies? Remember that these first paragraphs comprising Part I are largely introductory, and not evaluative yet.
Part two, on the other hand, consists of three to four paragraphs evaluating the argument. Is it effective? How so? Does the author present examples of mature reasoning? Discuss strengths and weaknesses of the argument as it posed in the article; however, do not offer your own counterargument in this evaluation. Support with particulars your judgment of the effectiveness of the argument; quote from the text of the article to particularize your points. You will want to use the first person, and to refer to your experience of reading the piece. You will also want to employ correct MLA style in documenting your response to the article. Finally, use present tense verbs when referring to elements of the argument; for example, rather than saying, “The author said,” or “She wrote,” your lead-ins and acknowledgement phrases should state “The author argues,” “According to Cohen,” or “She claims,” and so on: use specific, present tense verbs. Furnish your essay with a Work Cited page; Work, since the number of sources is singular.
The Rough Draft is due on 24 September, the Revised on 1 October.
Evaluative Criteria to guide your writing effort
Part 1
1) Introduction/Context defined: 10_____
2) Claim Identified: 10_____
3) Support for Claim Discussed: 10_____
4) Other Elements Analyzed: 10_____
Part 2
5) Evaluation of Argument: 10_____
6) Quotations & Paraphrases: 10_____
7) Specific Reference to Elements: 10_____
8) Use of correct MLA style: 10_____
9) Correctness of Grammar: 10_____
10) Correctness of Punctuation: 10_____
Total Quality Assessment: 100_____ { }
In order to guide your effort, there is a rubric on the reverse side of this sheet; furthermore, you are asked to divide the essay into two parts:
Part one consists of 2 to 3 paragraphs introducing the work by author and title, as well as noting the rhetorical context of the piece, its intended audience and other orienting information that you infer from clues accompanying the work’s publication. In addition, in part one you should note the author’s claim and your sense of his or her reasons offered in support of that claim; you should furthermore comment on what sort of evidence the author provides in support of those reasons, and you should comment briefly on how the argument is arranged and presented; does the author employ appeals to logic, to emotion, to ethics? Does he or she use humor, satire, or other strategies? Remember that these first paragraphs comprising Part I are largely introductory, and not evaluative yet.
Part two, on the other hand, consists of three to four paragraphs evaluating the argument. Is it effective? How so? Does the author present examples of mature reasoning? Discuss strengths and weaknesses of the argument as it posed in the article; however, do not offer your own counterargument in this evaluation. Support with particulars your judgment of the effectiveness of the argument; quote from the text of the article to particularize your points. You will want to use the first person, and to refer to your experience of reading the piece. You will also want to employ correct MLA style in documenting your response to the article. Finally, use present tense verbs when referring to elements of the argument; for example, rather than saying, “The author said,” or “She wrote,” your lead-ins and acknowledgement phrases should state “The author argues,” “According to Cohen,” or “She claims,” and so on: use specific, present tense verbs. Furnish your essay with a Work Cited page; Work, since the number of sources is singular.
The Rough Draft is due on 24 September, the Revised on 1 October.
Evaluative Criteria to guide your writing effort
Part 1
1) Introduction/Context defined: 10_____
2) Claim Identified: 10_____
3) Support for Claim Discussed: 10_____
4) Other Elements Analyzed: 10_____
Part 2
5) Evaluation of Argument: 10_____
6) Quotations & Paraphrases: 10_____
7) Specific Reference to Elements: 10_____
8) Use of correct MLA style: 10_____
9) Correctness of Grammar: 10_____
10) Correctness of Punctuation: 10_____
Total Quality Assessment: 100_____ { }
Previous answers to this question
This is a preview of an assignment submitted on our website by a student. If you need help with this question or any assignment help, click on the order button below and get started. We guarantee authentic, quality, 100% plagiarism free work or your money back.
Get The Answer