The Best "Write My Essay" Service You Can Find

We’ve never been focused at delivering average quality; our mission is to meet the expectations of every single customer. Our mission to deliver the highest quality on the market imposed the need for a top-level writing team. We attracted the most talented writers with degrees and experience in several areas of study. We don’t hire any writer who wants to work for us. We test and verify the skills of all candidates, but we also make sure they hold an MA or PhD degree in the niche they want to cover. We keep our writers motivated with bonuses and trainings. We make sure they meet the standards of our writing agency and we always check the way they work. What’s the main thing you want from a “write my essay” service? Great quality, of course! After all, you’re investing your money in this project, so you clearly need outstanding results. However, you’re not ready to pay an unreasonably expensive price for the paper you want to buy. The best solution would be to get a great paper for a price tag you can afford. RushMyEssay is the right service for you! Our prices are reasonable, and you can always use a discount to make them more affordable. The cost-effectiveness you get from us is not available at any other website in this industry. “Can you rush my essay to a really close deadline? ” If that’s the question on your mind, then the answer is: yes, we can deliver your paper by an urgent deadline. All you need to do is place the order today!

In your responses, ask your fellow classmates some follow-up questions or provide suggestions. You may want to ask them to clarify some things, identify some potential issues they may want to consider, and provide them with some suggestions regarding their recommendations. Continue to monitor the discussion forum until 5:00 p.m. MST on Day 7 of the week and respond to anyone who replies to your initial post. Carefully review the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate this Discussion Thread. Although there are many controversial topics in social psychology, this week’s theme of altruism versus egoism is one of the most provocative. The debate over whether humans are capable of pure altruism versus egoism is typically witnessed in the philosophy realm. However, there have been many social psychology studies conducted to determine whether or not humans are, in fact, capable of pure altruism. There is sound research to support both sides of the argument. Some of the research has shown that people do good deeds because they derive some benefit from them while others do good deeds for completely selfless reasons.

This week your discussion will consist of a debate with your classmates on altruism versus egoism. • The extent to which culture plays a role in altruistic or egoistic behavior. Your responses must be scholarly and avoid unsupported claims (e.g., personal opinions and generalizations). That is, you must support your assertions with credible, scientific evidence (peer-reviewed research). You have been assigned randomly to argue in favor of either altruism, egoism, or somewhere in between. This discussion may require you to take a perspective that differs from your own view of the issue. However, you must take the position of the topic to which you have been assigned. For example, if you are assigned to argue in favor of egoism but you really believe that people are somewhere in between altruism and egoism, you must find research to support arguments in favor of egoism. Your post should be approximately 500 words in length and include appropriate APA-style citations and references as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Guided Response: Please review several classmates’ posts and respond to at least two classmates’ initial posts. Each response must be to a student whose post consists of an opposing argument to yours. Carefully review the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate this Discussion Thread. In Week Three, you created a literature review around the scenario that you selected in Week One. For the Week Six assignment, you will create an intervention proposal that contains a professional recommendation for the chosen case study. The Intervention Proposal should incorporate any feedback that the instructor provided in the Week Four Literature Review or Week Two Annotated Bibliography assignments. • Briefly restate the problem from the chosen case study. • Compose a thesis statement that contains the student’s professional recommendation. The thesis statement should be located near the end of the second paragraph of the report. • Explain the relevant theories and empirical studies that have led to the student’s professional recommendation.

The explanation must include evaluations of seven to eight, peer-reviewed articles from the Annotated Bibliography that was created in Week Two. At least one of these articles must be about a specific empirical study.  What was the researchers’ research question?  What was their hypothesis?  How many participants did they have?  Was the research design method appropriate for that particular hypothesis?  Did their findings support the hypothesis?  What are the implications?  What are the limitations?  Why it is relevant.  Why it should be considered.  Why it should be discounted for this recommendation. Discuss any limitations or gaps in existing research. • Restate the professional recommendation in one to two concluding paragraphs. The paper must include a title page and references page, and it must be formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Organization tip: It is best to start with the least related and most broad article and move toward the most relevant. It can be helpful to think of the organization for this report as a funnel: The articles evaluated should get more and more specific and narrow in breadth throughout the report. Language Note: This report is being written for an audience that is not familiar with the theories and material that are discussed. This means that the paper needs to be accessible to all individuals. All technical terms, acronyms, and theories should be explained and jargon should be avoided.