Use ethnography to discuss different anthropologists who use a structuralist approach. What was structuralism reacting against? Are there limits to a structuralist analysis?

Use ethnography to discuss different anthropologists who use a structuralist approach. What was structuralism reacting against? Are there limits to a structuralist analysis?

Please use these articles:

1. Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1972. The effectiveness of symbols. In Structural anthropology, vol. 1. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, pp. 186-205 file:///C:/Users/dm_19/Downloads/The%20Effectiveness%20of%20Symbols%20-%20Levi-Strauss%20-%201972%20(2).pdf

2. Levi-Strauss, Claude. 1963. The sorcerer and his magic. In Structural Anthropology. New York: Basic Books, pp. 167-85 file:///C:/Users/dm_19/Downloads/The%20Sorcerer%20and%20His%20Magic%20-%20Levi-Strauss%20-%201972%20(1).pdf

3. Dumont, Louis. 1970. Chapter II: From System to Structure: The Pure and the Impure. In Homo Hierarchicus, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 33-64 file:///C:/Users/dm_19/Downloads/From%20System%20to%20Structure%20-%20Dumont%20-%201970.pdf

4. Radcliffe-Brown, A. R.. 1952. Religion and Society. In Structure and function in primitive society, London: Cohen and West, pp. 153-77 file:///C:/Users/dm_19/Downloads/Religion%20and%20Society%20-%20Radcliffe-Brown%20-%201952%20(1965).pdf

5. Turner, Victor. 1969. Chapter 3. Liminality and communitas. In The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Chicago: Aldine, pp. 94-130 file:///C:/Users/dm_19/Downloads/The%20Ritual%20Process%20(ch%203%20-%20Liminality%20and%20communitas)%20-%20Turner%20-%201969%20(2008)%20(3).pdf